guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25899: [PATCH] HACKING: Describe address@hidden as the list for patc


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#25899: [PATCH] HACKING: Describe address@hidden as the list for patches.
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:01:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Commit 230efa876fea3b38f78502bd759b2943651929de updated the manual to
>>> mention guix-patches.  Do we need anything more?
>>
>> Apparently yes, as people still send patches to guix-devel and at the
>> time when I wrote this patch were not aware of guix-patches.
>
> I agree.  It would be good to mention “guix-patches” in HACKING.  To me,
> patches that are in “guix-patches” have a much lower risk to be drowned
> out by other discussions.

Done in bc551cf32b6ccb3f8dd60b1d0d4e3c3e88cb1f8d!

Ludo'.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]