[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26802: [PATCH 3/4] guix: lint: Check for version in source file name
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#26802: [PATCH 3/4] guix: lint: Check for version in source file name. |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2017 23:01:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Arun Isaac <address@hidden> skribis:
>>> (define (origin-file-name-valid? origin)
>>> - ;; Return #f if the source file name contains only a version or is #f;
>>> - ;; indicates that the origin needs a 'file-name' field.
>>> + ;; Return #f if the source file name is #f, contains only a version, or
>>> + ;; does not contain a version; indicates that the origin needs a
>>> + ;; 'file-name' field.
>>> (let ((file-name (origin-actual-file-name origin))
>>> (version (package-version package)))
>>> (and file-name
>>> ;; Common in many projects is for the filename to start
>>> ;; with a "v" followed by the version,
>>> ;; e.g. "v3.2.0.tar.gz".
>>> - (not (string-match (string-append "^v?" version) file-name)))))
>>> + (not (string-match (string-append "^v?" version) file-name))
>>> + (string-match version file-name))))
>>
>> What about simply:
>>
>> (string-prefix? (string-append (package-name package) "-"
>> (package-version package))
>> file-name)
>
> This will break all those emacs, python, etc. packages that have
> "emacs-", "python-" prefixes in the package-name, but not in their
> source file names. We'll have to add the file-name field to practically
> every Guix package. I'm not sure this is a good idea.
Oh right, my bad.
> Couldn't we drop patch 3, and just use patch 4 to fix this bug?
Well patch 3 is OK after all, if you want to push it.
As for the patch 4, I prefer to let Alex reply!
Thanks,
Ludo’.