[bug#30274] [PATCH 00/21] gnu: Add licensecheck (license checker for source files).

[Oleg Pykhalov]

In addition to the cover letter.

Oleg Pykhalov <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello Guix,
>
> Licensecheck attempts to determine the license that applies to each file
> passed to it, by searching the start of the file for text belonging to various
> licenses.
>
>
> Some notes while I've adopted `guix import cpan` produced packages:
>
> - perl-b-hooks-op-check, perl-bareword-filehandles, perl-multidimensional had
>   a perl-gtk-perl in native-inputs.
>
> - perl-test-roo had a perl-bareword-filehandles in native-inputs.

`guix lint` failed on perl-strictures-2 and didn't lint other packages I
sended.  Well, will know this in future.

I have fixed following warning
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
gnu/packages/perl.scm:4313:14: address@hidden: synopsis should start with an 
upper-case letter or digit
gnu/packages/perl.scm:3972:14: address@hidden: no period allowed at the end of 
the synopsis
gnu/packages/perl.scm:369:17: address@hidden: description should start with an 
upper-case letter or digit
gnu/packages/perl.scm:1883:14: address@hidden: synopsis should start with an 
upper-case letter or digit
gnu/packages/perl.scm:9122:17: address@hidden: sentences in description should 
be followed by two spaces; possible infraction at 218
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The following are new to me, so should I add a "v" in (version …) for
those packages?  I see for example perl-file-find-object has it.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: 
address@hidden: can be upgraded to v3.0.31
/home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:33:2: 
address@hidden: can be upgraded to v3.0.31
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

[...]

Oleg.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature