guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#30495] [PATCH] bash completion: Complete files names after 'guix pa


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: [bug#30495] [PATCH] bash completion: Complete files names after 'guix package -m'.
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 16:45:42 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.26 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Oleg Pykhalov <address@hidden> writes:

> * etc/completion/bash/guix (_guix_is_dash_L): Replace with
> ‘_guix_is_dash_L_or_m’.
> (_guix_complete): Add this.

[...]

> diff --git a/etc/completion/bash/guix b/etc/completion/bash/guix
> index 6b84193db..286c4f1c5 100644
> --- a/etc/completion/bash/guix
> +++ b/etc/completion/bash/guix
> @@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ _guix_is_removing ()
>      $result
>  }
>  
> -_guix_is_dash_L ()
> +_guix_is_dash_L_or_m ()
>  {
> -    [ "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}" = "-L" ] \
> +    comp_words_minus_1="${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}"
> +    [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-L" ] || [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-m" ] \
>       || { case "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD]}" in
>                --load-path=*) true;;
>                *)             false;;

I think this fails to account for the long form "--manifest".  Perhaps
it's better to add a new "_guix_is_dash_m" and use

"if _guix_is_dash_L || _guix_is_dash_m"

below.  WDYT?

> @@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ _guix_complete ()
>       *)
>           if _guix_is_command "package"
>           then
> -             if _guix_is_dash_L
> +             if _guix_is_dash_L_or_m
>               then
>                   _guix_complete_file
>               elif _guix_is_removing
> -- 
> 2.16.1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]