[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GWhere-discussion] todo - new GWhere feature
From: |
Zero - GWhere |
Subject: |
Re: [GWhere-discussion] todo - new GWhere feature |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:02:22 +0200 |
Hi Jarkor and list,
> > > Also I note that it takes about between 30 and 40 Mb of ram when
> > > everything is loaded......It's that possible?
> > Did you use GWhere in debug mode?? Launch GWhere with the following
> > command line and check the contents of the gwhere.log file in order to
> > know if GWhere is in debug mode. So if it is in debug mode it can use
> > lot of memories as you say :
> > gwhere.exe > gwhere.log
> I ran it as you note, the log file is generated and always empty but when I
> enter
> Options and I leave (changing nothing) it's 144 bytes long containing:
>
> (gwhere.exe:600): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 3186
> (gtk_widget_grab_default): assertion `GTK_WIDGET_CAN_DEFAULT (widget)'
> failed
It was fixed in the last published version of GWhere 0.1.2.
> That's using the lastest win32 version.
> Anyway, I make a mistake in the post about memory loads. I post that with my
> bigger catalog file loaded. I run some test again and the program itself
> without
> any db loaded, takes about 3400~3500 KBytes. Loading a catalog file wich
> size is 684479 bytes long, takes 7880KB more and loading a big one, 2037089
> bytes long catalog file takes 34228KB more of ram. (Measured under win2k pro
> with mem usage under Windows Task Manager (I know is not the best method,
> but to have an idea).)
This seems normal compared to the current internal features of GWhere.
That's why I must improved the loading system...
Best regards,
Zero
Maintainer,
GWhere - Another way to manage your catalogs!!
http://www.gwhere.org
- Re: [GWhere-discussion] todo - new GWhere feature,
Zero - GWhere <=