Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst

[Benja Fallenstein]

address@hidden wrote:
> I wrote something *interesting* about current research with regard to p2p, as 
> we agreed in #gzz, in overview section. I think this a worth to mention, since 
> PeerNet differs from 'p2p mainstream' in 'layer'(application level <--> network 
> layer), but otherwise have very similar features as other application level p2p 
> systems (DHT-like routing, log n neighbors, log n routing, local knowledge etc).

But how is it relevant to Storm? I mean, you surely aren't saying that 
we should include everything that is interesting, no matter whether it 
is relevant or not? :-)

- Benja