Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article_structure.txt

[Benja Fallenstein]

Toni Alatalo wrote:
> generalizing section names:
>
> 1. intro: ok
> 2. rel work: ok
> 3. block storage: data model?
> 4. xanalogical storage: (hyper)media model?

Hm, we are presenting Storm, and the section structure follows Storm's 
main components in section 3-6 (intentionally, since we *are* talking 
design). I'm not sure I'd want to 'generalize' (one of those ACM tips 
for authors says: Do not try to generalize! Talk about your specific 
case well :-) )

I can see how it would be nice if the section names could tell the 
uninitiated reader what the section will be about, but I don't think 
'data model' and 'hypermedia model' cut that. :-) Plus, 'Xanalogical 
storage' should be a word known to many in the field, making it more 
precise than just 'hypermedia model.'

> 5. indexing: ok?

This is what I'm least comfortable with, since it doesn't seem to be 
descriptive enough a name...

> 6. versioning: ok?
> 7. peer-to-peer implementations: ?

What's the problem here?

> 8. experience and future directions: ok
> 9. conclusions: ok
> 10. acknowledgements: ok
> 11. references: ok

-b.