gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:39:09 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>      03/02/15 11:39:08

Modified files:
        storm          : article.rst 

Log message:
        rm some 'not worth to mention's

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/storm/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.172&tr2=1.173&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/storm/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.172 manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.173
--- manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.172 Sat Feb 15 11:37:50 2003
+++ manuscripts/storm/article.rst       Sat Feb 15 11:39:08 2003
@@ -1131,49 +1131,8 @@
 sizes, as (collections of) blocks, is partly unresolved.
 
 .. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
-   [how does video work here, i.e. are they huge blocks or collections of many
-   small, frames? or a sequence between two keyframes?]
-
-   Benja says: Probably large, but the number of links to them 
-   still won't be that big, I guess. Not sure how to discuss this
-   in the text; feel free to propose something :-)
-
-   Toni: will try.. wondering also about who to consult :o
-
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
-   Future directions: Implement home node model or directory model ?
-
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
-   Open issue: Firewall Transparency/NATs ?
-
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
-   Open issue: notes in the text about block sizes with video
-
-.. [not worth to mention, see above ? -Hermanni]
-   Open issue: other related systems (within gzz?) for e.g. more synchronous
-   collabaration (irc?)?
-
-.. [not worth to mention, first p2p proto then these ;) ? -Hermanni]
-   p2p -> cf half-life of peers (Mojo Nation): Is it desirable that 'weak' 
peers
-   participate in a DHT? -- In Circle, peers must have been online
-   for at least an hour... In which ways, then, can 'weak' peers contribute
-   to the network in a p2p fashion? Caching is certainly one central
-   way, esp. when combined with multisource downloading (this can
-   potentially boost download speeds to the full available bandwidth).
-   This is a performance/reliability issue rather than something
-   changing the fundamental qualities of the network, but still important.
- 
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]  
-   [Symphony supports heterogeneity of peers -Hermanni]
-
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
    The important point about p2p publishing is that no account and setup
    is necessary to start publishing.
-
-.. [not worth to mention ? -Hermanni]
-   One possibility: Use IBP for limited-time publishing, referring to
-   the location through the DHT? This might be related to p2p publishing.   
-
    
 
 Conclusions




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]