[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision review-answers-benja.txt
From: |
Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: |
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision review-answers-benja.txt |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Nov 2003 08:58:12 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/gzz
Module name: manuscripts
Branch:
Changes by: Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden> 03/11/08 08:58:12
Modified files:
FutureVision : review-answers-benja.txt
Log message:
more
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt
diff -u manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt:1.1
manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt:1.2
--- manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt:1.1 Sat Nov 8
08:43:54 2003
+++ manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt Sat Nov 8 08:58:11 2003
@@ -176,22 +176,32 @@
I wrote something about this in my Journal. We've adopted so much of Ted's
viewpoint that we've become contrarians, but technophobes? ;)
-
In particular, I believe that there is the basis of some really
interesting Semantic Web work here, where item-based editing and
display
is just one application of in terms of application-neutral,
semantically
modelled data.
-
Do you get the point of this?
+RDF is a structured data format. The stuff that the SemWeb people
+are interested in is to program things that process this data
+automatically. We're doing editing and displaying of a network of items,
+which is data. So this reviewer is saying that we could operate
+on the same data as the Semantic Web people, have their tools
+operate on data entered through our system and have their data
+displayed by us.
+
+ --
The presentation of the paper though is currently too bitty - too many
unelaborated claims interspersed with irrelevant technical details.
-
Ok, how will we address this.
+Go through the paper, keep an eye open for these, decide in each case
+whether to a) cut b) elaborate c) insert "in our opinion."
+
+ --
Specific Comments--
Abstract: if we build systems structured around things we care about,