[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] gzz TODO
From: |
Asko Soukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] gzz TODO |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 03:09:27 +0200 (EET) |
Happy new year!
Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > >> humppake:
> > >> - enhancing umltool
> > >>+ - make sure *ANY* document can be compiled
> > >>+ singly -- bi-directional links need not
> > >>+ work correctly, but a quick compile-fix
> > >>+ cycle is vital.
> > Tuomas wanted to compile a PEG to HTML, not process the UML in it.
> > Putting it under umltool was probably a mistake.
> I wanted both, actually
So, does umldoc in current Makefile work well enough?
Of course you are free to name it better :) Do we need to compile RSTs
without compiling UML-code in them?
Currently in Makefile:
umldoc:
$(JYTHON) metacode/umldoc.py $(INPUT)
INPUT can be a single rst-file or a directory, when all rsts in that
directory are processed (non-recursively).
e.g. compiling PEG into HTML:
make umldoc INPUT="doc/pegboard/foo/peg.rst"
--
Asko Soukka | Taitoniekantie 9 A 603 | address@hidden
+358-40-8235947 | FIN-40740 JYVÄSKYLÄ | http://www.iki.fi/asko.soukka/