|
From: | William L. Jarrold |
Subject: | Re: [Heartlogic-dev] do you have the reversal blues? |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:23:44 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 22:46 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:Is the item really reversed or not?I don't understand the question. Of course we know the item is reversed bc WE REVESED IT!!.What I meant is that it is not clear to me which class of ablations are also reversals and which class are ablations but not reversals.
ah. well i just added this new page that "defines" RevItem.Prior to 2005-06-15 BillJ believed that there were basically reversed and unreversed items. But now (2005-06-15) he thinks of things differently.
Reversal is like replacing "Happy" with "Sad" in his disssertation. Items created with this distinction are mostly NEGATED items.And reversal and negation fit into a larger framework of experimental manipulation or ablation.
Given other deadlines (e.g. talk) it is too much trouble at this point (2005-06-15) to change all of the RevItems to NegItem or some such.
anyway, we really should not get into a philosphical debate when i need to give a polished talk in less than 24 hours.Sure, I don't have anything to add anyway.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |