[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;'
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;' |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:48:08 +0100 |
At 16:05 +0100 2002/03/04, Akim Demaille wrote:
>Hans> The current implementation of %expect seems to depend on the
>Hans> type of algorithm used.
>
>Nah! Of course not. Since there is only one implementation in the
>current Bison.
When one is changing the algorithm, of course. :-)
> And in the future, with more algorithms implemented,
>the implementation of %expect will not change. What might change is
>the number of conflicts.
Specifically, the same input may produce different parsing results with
different algorithms (i.e., the languages parsed becomes different). Or do
you have a proof, showing the opposite? :-)
Hans Aberg
- RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Paul Eggert, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;',
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04