[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long)
From: |
Magnus Lie Hetland |
Subject: |
Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long) |
Date: |
Sun, 16 May 2004 10:46:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
[snip]
Just another example of why I need structured parsing: A natural
format for lists is something like "two or more paragraphs beginning
with single dashes constitute a list (with each being a list item). A
lone such paragraph is a plain paragraph". The markup here isn't
explicit, so a simple lexing won't do.
--
Magnus Lie Hetland "Wake up!" - Rage Against The Machine
http://hetland.org "Shut up!" - Linkin Park
- Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/15
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/16
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long),
Magnus Lie Hetland <=
- How about this, then... (Not quite non-greedy wildcard), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/16
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/16
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/16
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/17
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Magnus Lie Hetland, 2004/05/17
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/17
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Frank Heckenbach, 2004/05/17
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/18
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Frank Heckenbach, 2004/05/18
- Re: Non-greedy wildcard possible? (Long), Laurence Finston, 2004/05/19