Re: Reducing conflict: Was: Exceeded limits of %dprec/%merge?

[Joel E. Denny]

On Fri, 19 May 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> On Fri, 19 May 2006, Derek M Jones wrote:
> 
> > On the subject of new features.  I have just been bitten (again)
> > by not being able to execute any actions in when multiple parse
> > stacks are in existence.  Having a way of specifying a non-deferred
> > action would solve a recurring problem of mine.
> 
> I'm envisioning the conflict actions we discussed always executing 
> immediately.
> 
> Other than that, I have to say I'm currently not so interested in this.  
> Maybe someone else is.

Well, just for kicks, what do you want your nondeferred actions to do?

Joel