|
From: | Akim Demaille |
Subject: | Re: Renaming parser file |
Date: | Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:15:03 +0300 |
Le 21 août 06 à 20:42, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Frans Englich wrote:Any chance that %defines can be changed to also allow the name to be explicitly specified?I'm not sure why %defines and -d and are different from --defines, -o,--output, and %output. Reading the -d and --defines documentation makesit seem intentional. Since Paul and Akim know the history, I think they're probably best equipped to address this one.
I can't think of a good reason today :) I'm definitely in favor of supporting %defines "foo.h". I don't know why there is a = used for %output, it doesn't seem right to me, let's support it in the place we used to accept it, but deprecate it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |