Re: how to handle large varible sized semanitc values (in C-basedparsers)?

[Steve Murphy]

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 19:00 +0200, Hans Aberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> One idea of using %union is to save space, so it would no longer  
> apply with your definition, as the "union" takes up at least the
> size  
> of its smallest member.
> 
>    Hans Aberg

You mean, methinks, the size of its biggest member...?

murf

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature