[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:00:50 +0100 |
> On 17 Feb 2019, at 16:19, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Le 10 févr. 2019 à 15:20, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>>> On 10 Feb 2019, at 11:07, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> [*.dot vs. *.gv]
>>> But it's too late to change the default behavior.
>>
>> You might change it, as it is not usable on real life grammars.
>
> You have a point :)
Or a dot! :-)
> But it does not mean it will not break something for someone.
> Maybe bound to %require "3.4", why not.
Since .dot does not work in some editors, it might good to use .gv.
Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Hans Åberg, 2019/02/09
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Akim Demaille, 2019/02/10
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Hans Åberg, 2019/02/10
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Akim Demaille, 2019/02/17
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Akim Demaille, 2019/02/18
- Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, Hans Åberg, 2019/02/18
graph: prefer *.gv to *.dot (was: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing), Akim Demaille, 2019/02/19
RE: Re: bison info doc - precedence in recursive parsing, anand, 2019/02/14