[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?
From: |
Tim Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:30:50 +1100 (EST) |
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no wrote:
> netconfig in the action sequence comprises the interface
> configuration. Here there is an "Old way to do it" and a
> "new way to do it" (see docs). The fact that the actionsequence
> name does not match the interfaces seciton is a historical
> quirk, because I orginally solved the problem poorly and ended
> up rewriting something better.
Makes sense now. Thanks! But how do I define the IP addresses
for these interfaces? I see the source doesn't have any hidden ip address
options to this, and in fact, doesn't appear to set any ip address at all
(although I was just looking in parse.c and install.c). And I'm only on
2.1.0p1.
> > -----
> > interfaces:
> > "eth0:0" netmask=255.255.255.0 broadcast=ones
> > -----
Thanks,
--
Tim Nelson
Systems Administrator
Sunet Internet
Tel: +61 3 5241 1155
Fax: +61 3 5241 6187
Web: http://www.sunet.com.au/
Email: sysadmin@sunet.com.au
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?, Jamie Wilkinson, 2004/01/22
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?, David Douthitt, 2004/01/22