[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux ACLs
From: |
Sven Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Linux ACLs |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:51:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) |
Philippe [u] wrote on 26/10/2004 20:39:
Are you looking at the POSIX 1003.1e ACLs in the ext2/3 filesystem or SE
Linux stuff?
I thought the Linux ACL followed the Posix recommendations. This was
discussed a couple of weeks ago with Mark. I think Mark has considered
looking the Linux ACL API seriously.
There are two types of ACLs in Linux:
1) Filesystem ACLs, which should follow POSIX ACL recommendations
pretty closely.
2) Process ACLs (what resources process X of user Y is allowed to use)
which are a non-POSIX thing only available in SE Linux kernels
I think Mark wanted to look at (1) but actually looked at (2). ;-)
Not sure though, as I didn't write anything but scripts for ACLs (and
those only for (1)).
cu,
sven
- Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Wil Cooley, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs,
Sven Mueller <=
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/27
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, John Valdes, 2004/10/26