[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
segmentation fault in InitializeLocks
From: |
Lars Damerow |
Subject: |
segmentation fault in InitializeLocks |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:11:45 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
Hi folks,
Under certain circumstances (*ahem* kickstart again) cfagent dumps core with
the following gdb backtrace:
#0 0x4027d6cd in malloc_consolidate () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x4027ccaa in _int_malloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x4027c09d in malloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#3 0x400ce328 in __os_malloc () from /lib/tls/libdb-4.2.so
#4 0x400ce246 in __os_calloc () from /lib/tls/libdb-4.2.so
#5 0x4009cf2a in db_create () from /lib/tls/libdb-4.2.so
#6 0x08085216 in InitializeLocks () at locks.c:139
#7 0x08085c49 in PutLock (name=0x40334780 "\001") at locks.c:500
#8 0x0808574c in ReleaseCurrentLock () at locks.c:346
#9 0x080519b7 in Scripts () at do.c:1419
#10 0x0804d419 in DoTree (passes=2, info=0x809a70f "Main Tree")
at cfagent.c:1210
#11 0x0804b1ac in main (argc=10, argv=0xbffffaa4) at cfagent.c:178
#12 0x40230ad4 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#13 0x0804afc1 in _start()
Our kickstart script invokes cfagent five or six times, and it only causes a
segmentation fault on the first invocation. It also only happens on a certain
type of machine (an IBM BladeCenter blade).
Does this look familiar to anyone, and is there any other information I can
give that might help track it down?
Thanks,
lars
--
lars damerow
button pusher
pixar animation studios
lars@pixar.com
"What makes you think tearing my head off would kill me?" Captain Bo-Tard
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- segmentation fault in InitializeLocks,
Lars Damerow <=