Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts

[Moritz Bunkus]

Hey,

> No route to host = firewall?

No. The hosts in question are simply not running, but on the same
subnet. That's OK though, because they're workstations whose users are
not in today.

But that's not the point. The point is that cfrun prints

> > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket
> > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host

three times although the hosts ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de,
ls-bs-ws7.bs.linet-services.de and ls-bs-ws8.bs.linet-services.de are
the ones that aren't reachable. The output above is
useless. ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de is up and reachable, tested with
"cfrun ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de" (in fact, it is the host on which
I run "cfrun").

Moritz

-- 
LINET Services GbR

Gotenweg 15                      Tel.: 0531-280 191 71
38106 Braunschweig               Fax.: 0531-280 191 72

http://www.linet-services.de
info@linet-services.de

pgpwHAKApZYEq.pgp
Description: PGP signature