[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [h-e-w] Re: split-window-recent
From: |
Nascif Abousalh-Neto |
Subject: |
RE: [h-e-w] Re: split-window-recent |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2003 14:19:55 -0400 |
No, not really. I don't want to keep splitting the most recent window, but to have two and only two windows.
This function is meant to be a replacement for C-x 2.
Thanks anyway,
Nascif
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Berndl [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 11:24 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [h-e-w] Re: split-window-recent
>
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2003, Nascif Abousalh-Neto wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi all, I use the following command bound to C-x 2
> (according
> > to my notes the code was created by Colin Walters, thanks!)
> >
> > (defun split-window-recent ()
> > "Split the current window, and show the next most recently used
> > buffer in the newly created window."
> > (interactive)
> > (split-window)
> > (let ((nextbuf (caddr (buffer-list))))
> > (when nextbuf
> > (show-buffer (next-window (selected-window))
> > nextbuf))))
> >
> > It is quite nice 90% of the time, but every now and then
> it selects
> > the minibuffer buffer into the new window - which is clearly an
> > annoyance. I would like to test if the "nextbuf" buffer is the
> > minibuffer, but there seems to be no "minibuffer-p" or equivalent
> > test predicate (on GNU Emacs 21.2).
>
> Ok, here comes a new version of split-window-recent which is
> IMHO more cleaner and does also what you want:
>
> (defun split-window-recent ()
> (interactive)
> (split-window)
> (show-buffer (next-window (selected-window))
> (other-buffer)))
>
> Is this what you want?
> Klaus
>
>
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > TIA,
> > Nascif
> --
> Klaus Berndl mailto: address@hidden
> sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
> software design & management
> Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
> Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
>
>
>
>
- RE: [h-e-w] Re: split-window-recent,
Nascif Abousalh-Neto <=