[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries
From: |
Christoph Scholtes |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:32:41 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> <EventData>
>> <Data>emacs.exe</Data>
>> <Data>24.0.90.0</Data>
>> <Data>4e9e1382</Data>
>> <Data>ntdll.dll</Data>
>> <Data>6.1.7601.17514</Data>
>> <Data>4ce7ba58</Data>
>> <Data>c0000029</Data>
>> <Data>000907b6</Data>
>> <Data>760</Data>
>> <Data>01cc91fd0016c7e4</Data>
>> <Data>D:\emacs-24.0.90\bin\emacs.exe</Data>
>> <Data>C:\windows\SysWOW64\ntdll.dll</Data>
>
> Yes, that's the same crash that I cited.
Leo said that this happens with the last weekly build I provided. It was
compiled _without_ optimizations. The original report claimed to compile
with `-O2'.
Just to make sure, is specifying `--no-opt' enough to disable
optimizations when configuring or do I have to specify `-O0'
explicitely?
If this turns out to be a problem with 4.6.1 in general, I will switch
back to an older version. Or should I use `-fno-omit-frame-pointer'?
Christoph
- [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries,
Christoph Scholtes <=
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25