[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments in lexical definitions
From: |
Tobias Ostgathe |
Subject: |
Re: comments in lexical definitions |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 07:13:48 +0200 |
Great!!!
That's exactly what I needed. I was able to live with an additional
preprocessor, too, but
this is definitely the better way.
Thank you very much for your help
-Tobias
----- Original Message -----
From: "John W. Millaway" <address@hidden>
To: "Tobias Ostgathe" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; "Hans-Bernhard Broeker"
<address@hidden>; "W. L. Estes" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: comments in lexical definitions
> > > > I'm missing the possibility to include comments in lexical
definition
>
> Flex does allow comments everywhere you could possibly need them. This
> discussion suggests a failure in the flex docs to make the syntax clear.
What's
> the trick, then?
>
> 1. Use traditional C comments, not '//' comments.
> 2. INDENT THE COMMENT.
>
> -John
> (Exhaustive example follows)
>
> %{
> /* 1 */
> %}
> /* 2 */
> %option reentrant
> %x STATE_X
>
> %%
> /* 3 */
> ruleA /* 4 */ { /* 5 */}
> ruleB /* 6 */ ECHO; /* 7 */
> /* 8 */
> <STATE_X>{
> ruleC ECHO;
> /* 9 */
> ruleD ECHO;
> }
>
> %%
> /* 10 */
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: comments in lexical definitions,
Tobias Ostgathe <=