[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: still more 2.5.11 comments
From: |
John Millaway |
Subject: |
Re: still more 2.5.11 comments |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) |
> As 466 MHz machines are recent (within the past
> 4 years or so), that's a novel interpretation of "older systems".
> And you have apparently failed to account for the presence of the
> generated header files in the disk buffer cache.
The point was to ballpark the addition of one thousand headers. All 57MB of
headers certainly did not reside in the disk cache.
> Here's a quick test on a 3B1:
A 3B1!!!! Holy cow. Anyone toying with a 3B1 should expect to pull some tricks
to get things to perform.
In any case, this debate is now moot. You'll be relieved to know that the
latest revision of flex omits the user actions, dfa tables, and function
declarations from the generated headers. The resulting headers should be of
constant size, approximately 23KB. -John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
- still more 2.5.11 comments, Bruce Lilly, 2002/08/11
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, John Millaway, 2002/08/12
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, Bruce Lilly, 2002/08/12
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, John Millaway, 2002/08/12
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, Bruce Lilly, 2002/08/13
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, John Millaway, 2002/08/13
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, Bruce Lilly, 2002/08/13
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments,
John Millaway <=
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, Bruce Lilly, 2002/08/14
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, W. L. Estes, 2002/08/14
- Re: still more 2.5.11 comments, John Millaway, 2002/08/14