Re: [help-gengetopt] Re: Yet another issue

[Lorenzo Bettini]

Dave Swegen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 17:36 +0100, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>> Dave Swegen wrote:
>>> OK, the following line generates code that seems to incorrectly mark the
>>> option as required (which is certainly not my intention):
>>>
>>> option "sqn" - "sqn" argoptional multiple string
>>>
>> well if you don't want an option to be required you have to specify "no"
>> (by default an option is considered as required).  "argoptional",
>> instead, means that the argument of that option is optional.
> 
> Ah! Suddenly I see the light :)
> 
>> I must confess that "no" is quite confusing, and infact I'll add the
>> keyword "optional" which is much more explicative (and "required" for
>> "yes") :-)
> 
> Yes, that would be much more intuitive

in the release candidate I've uploaded these new keywords are available :-)

cheers
        Lorenzo

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|  Lorenzo Bettini          ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     |
|  PhD in Computer Science                            |
|  Dip. Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. di Firenze       |
|  Florence - Italy        (GNU/Linux User # 158233)  |
|  Home Page        : http://www.lorenzobettini.it    |
|  http://music.dsi.unifi.it         XKlaim language  |
|  http://www.purplesucker.com Deep Purple Cover Band |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite           |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt              |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/gengen       |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/doublecpp    |
+-----------------------------------------------------+