[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Sacha Chua |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:35:59 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) |
Klaus Berndl <Klaus.Berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at> writes:
> AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer ported from Cygwin
> to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs must still be installed by
> downloading one big archive (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled
> binaries), extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
apt-get install emacs21
.. and then apt-get install any of the Emacs packages I want, or
download the .els or source archives and play with them myself.
I love Debian. =)
I understand that the binary distribution of Emacs is also easy to
install if you're using RPMs.
--
Sacha Chua <sacha@free.net.ph> - 4 BS CS Ateneo geekette
interests: emacs, gnu/linux, wearables, teaching compsci
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, (continued)
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/09/10
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?,
Sacha Chua <=
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?, A. L. Meyers, 2002/09/14