[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w3 again,
From: |
Roger Mason |
Subject: |
Re: w3 again, |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:04:40 -0230 |
Hello,
I have now found the problem.
Firstly, you were correct that running sources vs. byte-code helps to sort
the problem.
Weh I run source code, with debug-on-error set to 't' I get the following
backtrace on invoking m-x w3:
Loading w3 (source)...
Loading cl-macs...done
Loading cus-edit...
Loading easymenu...done
Loading cus-edit...done
Loading w3 (source)...done
Loading url-auth (source)...done
Loading cl-seq...done
Loading w3-hot (source)...done
Cannot determine format of hotlist file:
/home/rmason/.mosaic-hotlist-default
Contacting host: www.cs.indiana.edu:80
Loading url-cache (source)...done
Downloading of `http://www.cs.indiana.edu/elisp/w3/docs.html' complete.
Parsed 80% of 2951...
Parsed 100% of 2951...done
Drawing... done
error in process filter: if: Symbol's value as variable is void:
font-running-xemacs
error in process filter: Symbol's value as variable is void:
font-running-xemacs
On grepping for this variable in the site-lisp directory, I find it is not
defined, so I put
;; Kludge by rm Oct. 2 2002
(defvar font-running-xemacs nil
"True if this is Xemacs. By default I set it to nil.")
in w3.el, and now everything seems to be OK.
I have not yet tried compiling and running compiled the code.
Thanks to all who assisted.
Roger Mason
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Kai [iso-8859-15] Großjohann wrote:
> Roger Mason <rmason@sparky2.esd.mun.ca> writes:
>
> > I checked the config.log for the url & w3 packages: the configure script
> > found 21.1 in both cases, which is correct.
>
> Hm. Could you M-: (load "w3.el") RET, then try again? Maybe now the
> backtrace is better, or the issue goes away completely.
>
> kai
> --
> ~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn (Frank Nobis)
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
>
- Re: w3 again,, Roger Mason, 2002/10/01
- Re: w3 again,,
Roger Mason <=