[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m
From: |
Michael J. Barillier |
Subject: |
Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Nov 2002 10:33:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) |
I've been using w3 off-and-on in the past, but since I'm trying to go
far more text-centric on my desktop[1] I'd like to do the little web
browsing that I do from within Emacs. I've downloaded w3 v4.0pre.47
and have been getting that nasty ``wrong type argument: stringp, nil''
error[2] that's been mentioned lately. Anyone have an opinion[3] on
W3 vs. emacs-w3m?
[1] Full-screen xterm running screen, with a Mozilla tab (using the
PWM window manager) as a last resort.
[2] No, I haven't tried to get a backtrace ... sorry.
[3] Heh
--
Michael J. Barillier
Registered Linux user #125310 <http://counter.li.org/>
``A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.''
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
pgpasoJryCfzd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m,
Michael J. Barillier <=
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Adam P., 2002/11/03
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Henrik Enberg, 2002/11/03
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, A. Lucien Meyers, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Henrik Enberg, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Michael J. Barillier, 2002/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Jay Belanger, 2002/11/05
Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, mr.sparkle, 2002/11/04