[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:11:35 GMT |
In article <mailman.1038324336.1840.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
Dani Barral <d.barral@staffs.ac.uk> wrote:
>Here is the new binding of <delete> is there a nicer way to write it?
>
>(define-key global-map [delete] (lambda () (interactive)
>(delete-backward-char -1)))
(global-set-key [delete] 'delete-char)
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Dani Barral, 2002/11/26
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Fredrik Staxeng, 2002/11/26
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/11/26
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Dani Barral, 2002/11/26
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding,
Barry Margolin <=
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Dani Barral, 2002/11/26
- Re: unexpected Del behaviour after C-d binding, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/11/26