help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Automatic Compiling


From: Ulrich Dirr
Subject: Re: Automatic Compiling
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:50:58 +0200

David Kastrup wrote:
> I am too stupid to understand the objection: the mentioned web page
> explicitly says
>
>     Anonymous CVS Access
>
>     This project's CVS repository can be checked out through anonymous
>     (pserver) CVS with the following instruction set. The module you
>     wish to check out must be specified as the modulename. When
>     prompted for a password for anoncvs, simply press the Enter key.
>
>     Software repository :
>
>     cvs -d:pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/auctex login
>
>     cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/auctex co
> <modulename>
>
> Apart from mentioning that the <modulename> is "auctex", I fail to
> see how one could make a "guide for dummies" that would be any
> different.

Ok, I've misunderstood something ... But I've successfully downloaded
this version and run the everything with the help of mingw make. First
I'm not sure if everything went ok.

The last lines of 'make install' are
[...]
 /bin/install -c -m 644 style/subfigure.el
/c/bin/emacs-21.2/site-lisp/auctex/style
 /bin/install -c -m 644 style/subfigure.elc
/c/bin/emacs-21.2/site-lisp/auctex/style
./mkinstalldirs /c/bin/emacs-21.2/site-lisp/auctex/auto
cd doc; make install
make[1]: Entering directory `/c/usr/uli/auctex/doc'
../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/info
for x in auctex auctex-*; do \
        /bin/install -c -m 644 $x /usr/local/info ; \
done
/bin/install-info  --info-dir=/usr/local/info auctex
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/usr/uli/auctex/doc'

Is this 'standard' console output? Where can I check that the newest
auctex is correctly installed and working (maybe like the version info
of emacs in the menu bar)? Do I have to update other files besides
auctex?

Second I don't see any other behavior when compiling. I still have to
input everything by hand (as listed in my first mail).

Probably something is wrong. Any idea?

Best regards,
Ulrich Dirr

P.S. please be patient with me, I'm very unexperienced with this new
environment.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]