[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term"
|
From: |
Subhankar Chatterjee |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term" |
|
Date: |
10 Jul 2003 01:22:05 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Hello,
kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) writes:
>
> > Could someone who uses eshell, or who has tried it,
> > please tell us the advantages and disadvantages are
> > of eshell?
[....]
> The biggest disadvantage of eshell is that it is not well
> documented.
[...]
I have managed a URL with good documentation. Neglected this site for quite
some time. Good stuff indeed.
Visit http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/CategoryEshell
Regards
-Subhankar
--
blue pill or red pill
--