[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what is the point of point-min?
From: |
Jesper Harder |
Subject: |
Re: what is the point of point-min? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Aug 2003 05:32:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:
> * Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com> on Thu, 28 Aug 2003
>
> | Yes, but what I meant to say with »other instances« was if there are
> | any cases where (region-end) is not equivalent to (max (point) (mark)).
>
> That is a very different question, but the answer is still "yes".
> One case is with XEmacs. If zmacs-regions is t then (mark) returns
> nil unless the region is active (highlighted).
Ah yes, thanks.
But I also noticed that `region-end' isn't even completely compatible
between the two Emacsen. `region-end' in XEmacs is equivalent to:
(let ((mark-even-if-inactive t))
(region-end))
in Emacs.
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, (continued)
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Oliver Scholz, 2003/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/08/29
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Rob Thorpe, 2003/08/29
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Jesper Harder, 2003/08/29
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Jesper Harder, 2003/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: what is the point of point-min?,
Jesper Harder <=
- Message not available
- Re: what is the point of point-min?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/08/31