[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mode for Manuscripts?
From: |
Rob Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: Mode for Manuscripts? |
Date: |
3 Dec 2003 08:48:43 -0800 |
I sometimes use Emacs for similar purposes. What would be useful to
me is a mode where:
* Tabs that just tab rather than whitespacing to the next word on the
line above, which hardly ever makes sense (of course I can do this by
binding tab to M-i)
* Once tab has been used at the start of a line it would be nice if
auto-fill-mode didn't begin at the new indent. This makes sense for
programming languages but no sense for text.
Personally I deal with things like line spacing later when printing
anything out.
gebser@speakeasy.net wrote in message
news:<mailman.794.1070142961.399.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>...
> Yeah, it's a funny way to format text, but it's the format required
>
> for manuscript submissions to publishers. Since emacs is such a great
>
> editor, perhaps the best on the planet, I'm sure there is a mode already
>
> constructed for this sort of format you see here in the body of this
>
> email.
>
> Here are the specifications explicitly stated: Text must be
>
> double-spaced. Owing to the need for margins, text should wrap. There
>
> should be one space, not two, between sentences. Automatic tabs to
>
> indicate breaks between paragraphs. I think by this they mean a ^I
>
> character must begin a paragraph. Use regular double spaces between
>
> paragraphs (as you see at the beginning of the current paragraph. Use
>
> only one space, not two spaces, between sentences.
>
> So does such a mode already exist for emacs? Of course I'd want C-n
>
> and C-p to move the cursor to a text line and not to a blank line in
>
> between text lines. I know that "pr -d" will do the double-spacing for
>
> me after I write up the whole thing, but it would be nicer for emacs to
>
> do the double-spacing for me as I go along. The M-a and M-e keys should
>
> get me to the beginning and end of sentences and M-q should reformat
>
> stuff I screw up by editing.
>
> Finally, it would be best to have a separate (minor?) mode for this
>
> sort of format-- this so I would have to set and unset a lot of
>
> variables every time I go in and out of editing in this mode.
>
> Any help or tips would be very much appreciated.
>
>
>
> ken
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, giacomo boffi, 2003/12/01
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/01
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, gebser, 2003/12/02
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?,
Rob Thorpe <=
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/17
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/18
- Re: Mode for Manuscripts?, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/22