[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does anybody have EUDC and OpenLDAP working?
From: |
Bruce S. Skinner |
Subject: |
Re: Does anybody have EUDC and OpenLDAP working? |
Date: |
18 Jan 2004 14:49:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Hello Martin,
I have it working now thanks to Dan Katz (see his post). Your fix is
pretty much what he did (see his post in this thread). I would have
headed down the -tt option route if I had known about it. The manpage
for ldapsearch v2.1.22 is mis-leading
"
-t Write retrieved values to a set of temporary files. This is
useful for dealing with non-ASCII values such as jpegPhoto or
audio.
"
and it doesn't mention option '-tt' anywhere.
Thanks very much and
regards :-)
BruceS
Martin Morgan <mmorgan@wsu.edu> writes:
> > Bruce.Skinner@drdc-rddc.gc.ca (Bruce S. Skinner) 14:22 15/1/2004 wrote:
> >
> > BSS> When doing a directory search I get the error:
> >
> > BSS> Opening input file: no such file or directory,
> > BSS> /home/skinner/unrecognized option -B
> >
> > BSS> My environment is Emacs v21.2.1, OpenLDAP 2.1.22
>
> I've just been struggling with this.
>
> I think there are two things. First, the variable
> ldap-host-parameters-alist has a default option -B, but I think
> openldap doesn't recognize this option. So use customize-variable
> ldap-host-parameters-alist and delete this.
>
> Second and more problematic is in the ldap.el file. The function
> ldap-search-internal parses the info that comes back from ldapsearch
> with this snippet:
>
> (while (looking-at "^\\(\\w*\\)[=:\t ]+\\(<[\t ]*file://\\)?\\(.*\\)$")
> (setq name (match-string 1)
> value (match-string 3))
> (save-excursion
> (set-buffer bufval)
> (erase-buffer)
> (insert-file-contents-literally value)
> (delete-file value)
> (setq value (buffer-substring (point-min) (point-max))))
> (setq record (cons (list name value)
> record))
> (forward-line 1))
>
> although written otherwise, the regexp is designed for ldapsearch
> storing each search key in a temporary file (with OpenLDAP this would
> be accomplished by the variable -tt), and the search itself returning
> a list of keys and the file they're stored in. The regexp extracts the
> file tag and file name, and then, in the save-excursion retrieves the
> info from the file. What actually happens with the default arguments
> is that the keys are not saved to file, but are returned as key: value
> pairs. The regexp picks up the value, but the value is treated as a
> file name. Here's my kludge:
>
> (while (looking-at "^\\(\\w*\\)[=:\t ]+\\(<[\t ]*file://\\)?\\(.*\\)$")
> (setq name (match-string 1)
> file (match-string 2) ; mtm -- only match with binary files
> value (match-string 3))
> (if file ; mtm -- read any
> binary files
> (save-excursion
> (set-buffer bufval)
> (erase-buffer)
> (insert-file-contents-literally value)
> (delete-file value)
> (setq value (buffer-substring (point-min) (point-max))))
> ) ; mtm -- end if
>
> Basically, only replace the value with file contents when a value is
> actually returned in a file (apparently, this can happen with the -t
> option if, for instance, the LDAP server stores, e.g., pictures of
> each entry).
>
> It's not enough just to feed -tt as an option in
> ldap-host-parameters-alist (which would be overkill anyway, storing
> all values in temporary files) because earlier in the
> ldap-search-internal routine there's an assumption about the format of
> the output (that the first line after blank is dn: value) that isn't
> true for the default ldapsearch parameters (where the first line after
> a blank is a comment). I *think* the non-coding solution is to
> customize the ldap-host-parameters-alist to -LLL and -tt. If you go
> with this option, you might need to make ensure file naming
> conventions so that OpenLDAP deals with spaces in file names
> correctly.
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> Dmitry Astapov <adept@ukr.net> writes:
>
> > Evening, Bruce.
> >
> >
> > Lucky you. I (with xemacs 21.4.14 and openldap 2.1.23) often get my xemacs
> > crashed on the first (after reboot) eudc search. It goes on for quite a
> > long time and I honestly dont know what to do about it ...
>
> This, unfortunately, I cannot help with.
--
Bruce S. Skinner
Defence R&D Canada - Atlantic
9 Grove St. <mailto:Bruce.Skinner@drdc-rddc.gc.ca>
P.O. Box 1012 <http://www.drdc-rddc.dnd.ca>
Dartmouth NS
CANADA tel: (902) 426-3100 x205
B2Y 3Z7 fax: (902) 426-9654