Re: CL compatibility question

[Miles Bader]

Joe Corneli <jcorneli@math.utexas.edu> writes:
> (defmacro defbashfun (name lambda &body body)
>   `(defun ,name (&rest $@)
>      (apply (lambda ,lambda ,@body) $@)))
...
> Why is this?  Are there plans that would change this behavior in the
> future?

Use &rest, not &body (in CL, &body is really just &rest with a hint to
the pretty-printer).

-Miles
-- 
[|nurgle|]  ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
            will  make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
[iddt]      nurg, that's the goal