[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Kai Grossjohann |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:19:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) writes:
> Of course, again, the point is that an X window manager is
> flexible, and *any* of those options can be changed to suit
> *any* user.
Oh, no! I've tried twm, piewm, olvwm, mwm, dtwm, ctwm, fvwm1, fvwm2,
wmaker, ion, larswm, wmx, sawfish, MetaCity, ratpoison, IceWM,
BlackBox, FluxBox, OpenBox, and perhaps some others, and none of them
suits me, and none of them was flexible enough.
Currently, I use OpenBox. It's painful, but I can bear it.
Kai
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Jay Belanger, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/11/21
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/21
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/21
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23