[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Kai Grossjohann |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:03:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Maciek Pasternacki <maciekp@japhy.fnord.org> writes:
> On Setting Orange, The Aftermath 38, 3170 YOLD, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
>
>>> Also, I don't like screen(1) eating my C-a which I use frequently to
>>> jump to beginning of line in shell. After thinking about other
>>> binding to use, I realised that I use virtually every binding (since
>>> I learned Emacs I use the same bindings in shell).
>>
>> I use ` for screen, `` inserts a single ` character. Works quite well.
>
> ...except when you try to paste a shell script from
> editor/browser/whatever. Before I had ScreenTerm and could safely
> disable hotkey I also used backtick but strange things happening when
> pasting textwere annoying.
Yeah. A friend uses C-o, perhaps that's better. In a shell, you
don't use C-o that often, and for the few times, C-o o is good enough,
I think.
>> I started a screen daemon and changed my WM config so that all xterms
>> attach to the same daemon. This means that the list of shell sessions
>> and the number of xterms I've got are decoupled. Very useful. I can
>> just create an xterm on demand to look at a shell session, then close
>> the xterm and the shell is still there.
>
> I prefer to run few screen sessions and have terminal windows
> independent of each other. Of course I can run the same session in
> two windows but I like to have my net-related windows (irssi, ekg2,
> SSH sessions, gnus-agent-batch) in one screen and `development' shells
> (ones I temporarily use when programming) in second one, not
> interfering with each other. If I used single screen for everything
> there'd be too much screen windows for me -- usually I use about 5
> screen windows per session; more than 8-9 shells in one screen is just
> confusing for me.
What's missing for screen is the equivalent of C-x b or iswitchb.
Kai
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/21
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Kai Grossjohann <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, Daniel Pittman, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Mike, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24