[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:24:00 -0600 |
Shamelessly capitalizing on this popular thread with an on-topic
post...
Ironically, for people who _just use emacs_, this isn't really
relevant.
For everyone else: A while ago, I brought up the idea of setting up
Emacs as a filter sitting between you and your applications. This
should enable scripting of pretty much any user interaction. I also
was curious about the possibilities for using Emacs functions (like
search, copy) inside of other X applications (e.g. a graphical
webbrowser).
This seems like a good place to bring these ideas up again, with one
additional piece of information. The program Xnee seems like it could
be wrapped or repackaged in Emacs to facilitate full-blown scripting.
Making the text and other UI components of all windows accessible to
Emacs would seem to require some fundamental changes to a lot of
programs or to X or both. :(
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Mathias Dahl, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Joe Corneli <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, ken, 2004/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Micha Feigin, 2004/11/28
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Hansen, 2004/11/28