[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?
From: |
D P Schreber |
Subject: |
Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal? |
Date: |
13 Dec 2004 15:56:03 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Darwin) |
On 2004-12-13, Emar <e.maier@phil.kun.nl> wrote:
> Here's my problem: I installed Emacs with X11 support through Fink on
> Mac OS X 10.3.
You installed a precompiled binary package (with dselect or apt-get) or
you built it from sources ('fink install ...')?
> I've done it before and it worked great, but now I can't
> seem to get Emacs out of terminal mode. I can only launch it from
> Apple's Terminal.app and X11 terminals (after setting the PATH
> variables to include /sw/bin/)
If you define PATH in ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist to include /sw/bin,
you won't have to go through an intermediate shell in this way.
> and then it stays in the terminal
When you launch it from the xterm, where is /sw/bin on PATH? To put it
another way, what does 'which emacs' say?
When you launch from Terminal, what's the value of DISPLAY?
> Apple X11 (based on Xfree4.3.0)
Did you install the X11 developer package as well?
> 4) Before I used to use an applescript to launch my X11 emacs
If you fix up ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist you won't have to do this
silliness any more...
- X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, Emar, 2004/12/13
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?,
D P Schreber <=
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, D P Schreber, 2004/12/13
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, Joe Corneli, 2004/12/13
- Message not available
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, D P Schreber, 2004/12/13
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, Joe Corneli, 2004/12/13
- Message not available
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, Barry Margolin, 2004/12/13
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, Joe Corneli, 2004/12/13
- Message not available
- Re: X11 Mac OS X 10.3 emacs fink: only terminal?, D P Schreber, 2004/12/14