[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:39:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>>floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) writes:
>>
>>> Ravi Uday <raviuday@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>><snip>
>>>>> The command is `emacsclient', one word with no dash.
>>>>> I belive that was a misprint in the previous message, maybe
>>>>> due to the
>>>>> dash in the command that start the sever ;)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yea right, it works, but how does one start the server to enable
>>>>this client to connect to it. Do you have a procedure which
>>>>could be easily followed ?
>>>
>>> Everyone is telling you to put it into your ~/.emacs, and I'm going
>>> to tell you *do not do that*! If you do, it means you cannot
>>> execute Emacs without starting a server... a limitation you do
>>> *not* want.
>>
>>emacs -q
>
> Wonderful... ;-)
>
> (I don't think the OP wants an invocation of emacs like that. We
> are not addressing seasoned users and developers...)
Whatever.
>>but apart from that, if a server is already running, no new server
>>gets started.
>
> Sure, but if you don't want to start a server...
emacs --eval "(defalias 'server-start 'ignore)"
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Ravi Uday, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Neon Absentius, 2004/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Ravi Uday, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Christian Plate, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Neon Absentius, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Peter Dyballa, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, kurtz, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Kastrup, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?,
David Kastrup <=