[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: Use ido for *all* completion? |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:53:16 +0100 |
Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> writes:
> Excuse me, did you actually take the time to try M-x icomplete-mode?
Did you take the time to try ido? :-)
They do entirely different things, icomplete merely shows the available
completions; ido does substring/flexible/regexp matching, allows you to
rotate through the list of available completions, etc.
--
Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> | I'm closer than ever to
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | finding the hidden track.
- Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- RE: Use ido for *all* completion?, Drew Adams, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Peter Lee, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/09