[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: Use ido for *all* completion? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:43:42 +0100 |
Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> writes:
> Yes.
And don't you agree that while they both show available completions,
icomplete is nowhere near ido when it comes to functionality? Or am I
missing something?
--
Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> | Sometimes I don't know where
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | this dirty road is taking me,
| sometimes I can't even see
| the reason why.
- Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- RE: Use ido for *all* completion?, Drew Adams, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Peter Lee, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/09