[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs and osx
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: emacs and osx |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:02:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bob Hunter <catdogbeloved@yahoo.com> writes:
> Yes, emacs-tetris is small, but emacs is still a huge text
> editor. What about the other such (extra) objects who build up to
> 120MB? One should be able to choose whether to have games, as well as
> option x, y, or z, rather than being forced to have them.
You're not forced to use them, it only uses disk space. (Things get
loaded when you actually use them.) That seems like a small price to
pay. The benefits are huge, IMO. You can do almost anything with
Emacs. All your editing needs are covered.
Lute.
--
(spook) => "LLNL RSA ISEC"
(insert-file-contents "~/.signature") => (error "`~/.signature' too rude")
- Re: emacs and osx, (continued)
- Re: emacs and osx, Miles Bader, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Peter Dyballa, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx,
Lute Kamstra <=
- Re: emacs and osx, Ismael Valladolid Torres, 2005/04/13
- Message not available
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Joe Corneli, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Ismael Valladolid Torres, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Tetris, Peter Dyballa, 2005/04/13