[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs and osx
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: emacs and osx |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:57:25 +0900 |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> Anyway, I just tried an experimental tar+zip on my CVS tree (which is
> not completely clean) and this resulted in 68MB. So you might not
> have the CVS backup of the Emacs repository, after all. Try using it.
A "clean" tar+gzip file of the source tree is about 23MB (this doesn't
include _any_ build-products like compiled elisp files or info files).
-Miles
--
We live, as we dream -- alone....
- Re: emacs and osx, (continued)
- Re: emacs and osx, Sébastien Kirche, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Jochem Huhmann, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Miles Bader, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Peter Dyballa, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13