|
From: | treebeard |
Subject: | Re: "Best" way to run on Windows XP |
Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:07:40 GMT |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) |
Chris Lott wrote:
I find using the Windows-native Emacs or XEmacs in conjunction with the cygwin tools to be the most versatile. Either way, you have access to all of the binaries on the path (incl the cygwin binaries). One thing I really like about the native vs. cygwin versions is that drag-and-drop of directories or files from Windows Explorer is supported.Is the "best" way to run emacs on Windows XP to use the Native XP build or the Cygwin? By "best" I mean: stable, able to run elisp code from emacs.sources, and able to effectively use external tools like grep, diff, etc... ? c
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |