[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Window size specification ignored
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: Window size specification ignored |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:57:59 +0200 |
Am 12.09.2005 um 02:58 schrieb August Karlstrom:
Am I missing something?
At least the correct Ubuntu ps syntax ... I am using a BSD style ps.
'man ps', inside Emacs as 'M-x manual-entry ps' or F1 F2, should be
your friend. And it's worth doing the experiments inside GNU Emacs in
its shell buffer.
Ubuntu's setup with so many sym-links reminds of Fink for Mac OS X: I
never knew exactly which file now was executing, and even worse: the
Fink folks messed up the site specific things with a lot of
intermediate and extra files that loaded each others for unknown
reasons (it is similiar to some so-called Carbon Emacsen). Do you have
an idea how much longer it takes to launch Fink's GNU Emacs 21.3.50
with -Q then without -Q? Minutes. Really.
Beside this I have the feeling that Ubuntu is using a pretty old Emacs.
Have you checked its version? This could explain that it does not
understand -Q. Apple's gift of GNU Emacs 21.2, for use inside a
terminal emulation only, does not understand -Q too.
Are you able to 'trace' a programme's execution, i.e. follow it opening
and closing files, doing system calls, receiving signals etc? This way
you would find which Ubuntu specific Elisp files were executed at
start-up ... but it's much easier to get GNU Emacs 22.0.50 from CVS and
compile it yourself. A (much better then) nice'd 'make bootstrap' in
the background will take one or two hours while you're having
breakfast, lunch, or dinner, or going shopping -- it should be more
satisfactory in the end! To do this you'll need many Ubuntu dev
packages, containing C header files needed for 'dev-elopment', i.e.
compiling a software.
--
Greetings
Pete
Without vi there is only GNU Emacs