Re: outline-minor-mode-prefix doen't work?

[David Kastrup]

William Xu <william.xwl@gmail.com> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I repeat Stefan's question:
>>
>>>>>> Why do you need to (require 'outline)?
>>
>> You don't need to load outline real fast for the setting of
>> outline-minor-mode-prefix to have an effect.
>
> The point is that setting of outline-minor-mode-prefix should be done
> before loading outline.el, or more exactly, defining the keymap. Do we
> agree on this? If yes, adding (require 'outline) afterwards is just
> explicitly to guarantee this.

Nonsense.  The require will do nothing if it has been loaded already,
and the effect of the setq will take place whenever outline eventually
gets loaded.

>> It is sufficient that it will be loaded at some point of time.
>
> This sufficiency depends on using some features like autoload,
> eval-after-load, in outline.el ?

Why would it?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum