[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?
|
From: |
Brian Elmegaard |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode? |
|
Date: |
03 Dec 2005 11:28:28 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Ian Zimmerman <nobrowser@gmail.com> writes:
> Please fix the grammar here first; the sense is lost.
Oops, sorry.
The question is: What differences should or could be expected when
interactively loading and running a lisp function compared to a call
like:
emacs foo.bar -l baz.el -f baz
--
Brian (remove the sport for mail)
http://www.et.web.mek.dtu.dk/Staff/be/be.html
http://www.rugbyklubben-speed.dk
- Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/01
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Ian Zimmerman, 2005/12/02
- Message not available
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?,
Brian Elmegaard <=
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/03
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, David Kastrup, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, David Kastrup, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07