[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q on minibuffer-message
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Q on minibuffer-message |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:42:57 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:54:35 -0800
> Cc:
>
> In that case, what I suggest is that you set up foo with an optional
> argument that is provided as t when it is called interactively. And
> foo should only display its messages when that argument is t.
>
> That's just what I wanted to avoid having to do. From my original message:
>
> I could change the definition of command `foo', to pass it a flag to not
> call `minibuffer-message' (or to call it only when the command is called
> interactively), but I'd rather not have to resort to that.
This doesn't explain why you wanted to avoid such a solution.
- Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/20
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Lennart Borgman, 2006/01/20
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/20
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/22
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/22
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Ian Zimmerman, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/24